On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2015-08-13 9:21 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to>: > >> On 8/13/15 9:18 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: >> >>> nnulls() >>> >> >> I think I'd prefer num_nulls() over that. >> > > can be > > what about similar twin function num_nonulls()? > Yes. But I'm can't see any precedent for naming it like num_*... And if anything, should it be num_nonnulls() then?
