2015-08-13 9:47 GMT+02:00 Shulgin, Oleksandr <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de>:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-08-13 9:21 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to>: >> >>> On 8/13/15 9:18 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: >>> >>>> nnulls() >>>> >>> >>> I think I'd prefer num_nulls() over that. >>> >> >> can be >> >> what about similar twin function num_nonulls()? >> > > Yes. But I'm can't see any precedent for naming it like num_*... And if > anything, should it be num_nonnulls() then? > it is detail - depends on final naming convention.
