On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On July 9, 2015 9:13:20 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Unfortunately I don't know what that means about the API. Does it mean >>that none of the functions declared in any .h file can have their >>signatures changed? But new functions can be added? > > That's the safest way. Sometimes you can decide that a function can not > sanely be called by external code and thus change the signature. But I'd > rather not risk or here, IRS quite possible that one pod these is used by a > extension.
Where are we on this? Could there be a version for <= 9.2? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers