On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On July 9, 2015 9:13:20 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Unfortunately I don't know what that means about the API.  Does it mean
>>that none of the functions declared in any .h file can have their
>>signatures changed?  But new functions can be added?
> That's the safest way. Sometimes you can decide that a function can not 
> sanely be called by external code and thus change the signature. But I'd 
> rather not risk or here, IRS quite possible that one pod these is used by a 
> extension.

Where are we on this? Could there be a version for <= 9.2?

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to