Hi KaiGai-san,

On 2015/08/25 10:18, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
How about your opinion towards the solution?

Likely, what you need to do are...
1. Save the alternative path on fdw_paths when foreign join push-down.
    GetForeignJoinPaths() may be called multiple times towards a particular
    joinrel according to the combination of innerrel/outerrel.
    RelOptInfo->fdw_private allows to avoid construction of same remote
    join path multiple times. On the second or later invocation, it may be
    a good tactics to reference cheapest_startup_path and replace the saved
    one if later invocation have cheaper one, prior to exit.

I'm not sure that the tactics is a good one. I think you probably assume that GetForeignJoinPaths executes set_cheapest each time that gets called, but ISTM that that would be expensive. (That is one of the reason why I think it would be better to hook that routine in standard_join_search.)

2. Save the alternative Plan nodes on fdw_plans or lefttree/righttree
    somewhere you like at the GetForeignPlan()
3. Makes BeginForeignScan() to call ExecInitNode() towards the plan node
    saved at (2), then save the PlanState on fdw_ps, lefttree/righttree,
    or somewhere private area if not displayed on EXPLAIN.
4. Implement ForeignRecheck() routine. If scanrelid==0, it kicks the
    planstate node saved at (3) to generate tuple slot. Then, call the
    ExecQual() to check qualifiers being pushed down.
5. Makes EndForeignScab() to call ExecEndNode() towards the PlanState
    saved at (3).

I never think above steps are "too" complicated for people who can write
FDW drivers. It is what developer usually does.

Sorry, my explanation was not accurate, but the design that you proposed looks complicated beyond necessity. I think we should add an FDW API for doing something if FDWs have more knowledge about doing that than the core, but in your proposal, instead of the core, an FDW has to eventually do a lot of the core's work: ExecInitNode, ExecProcNode, ExecQual, ExecEndNode and so on.

Thank you for the comments!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to