On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments? > > Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.
Yeah. I bet there's a lot more useful stuff we could include also, but everything Andres mentioned is certainly good to put in there. Alternatively, some of this stuff could go into a README file instead of the documentation, but I think we've been leaning toward documenting more C stuff lately, and I'm fine with that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
