Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hmm ... wait a second. The main collection of asm blocks in s_lock.h >> believes that Intel's compiler will take gcc-style asm without any help:
> The 2005 block seems to have been the result of this thread: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200503090429.j294tlg10...@candle.pha.pa.us > That thread seems pretty clear about asm() not working in that > poster's environment. See followups --- the true story is that icc can do asm blocks on x86[_64], but not ia64. I've now documented this accurately, and fixed various places that were confused about it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
