On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Hmm ... wait a second. The main collection of asm blocks in s_lock.h >>> believes that Intel's compiler will take gcc-style asm without any help: > >> The 2005 block seems to have been the result of this thread: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200503090429.j294tlg10...@candle.pha.pa.us >> That thread seems pretty clear about asm() not working in that >> poster's environment. > > See followups --- the true story is that icc can do asm blocks on > x86[_64], but not ia64. I've now documented this accurately, and > fixed various places that were confused about it.
Thanks. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
