On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > So apparently, the > CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated > occasionally. Next steps would be to commit some or all of these > differences after additional verification, and then update the scripts > to use whatever the non-obsolete mapping sources are supposed to be.
Would that pose a problem for databases which have data in them already using the old mappings? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
