On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (3) posix_fadvise on Linux is a bad idea... the good news is that it
>> is not needed there:-) How good or bad an idea it is on other system
>> is an open question...
> I don't know what is the best way to verify that, if some body else has
> access to such a m/c, please help to get that verified.
Why wouldn't we just leave it out then? Putting it in when the one
platform we've tried it on shows a regression makes no sense. We
shouldn't include it and then remove it if someone can prove it's bad;
we should only include it in the first place if we have good
benchmarks showing that it is good.
Does anyone have a big Windows box they can try this on?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: