On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:32:10AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkuma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function
> > > with RAISE statements.
> > Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing.
> I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the
> respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on
+20 or so here, that being the number of times I recall offhand having
written the function.
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: