Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: > On 9/15/15 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> AFAICT from a quick look at its documentation, asciidoc can produce >> either html or docbook output; so as soon as you want something other >> than html output (in particular, PDF), you're back to relying on the >> exact same creaky docbook toolchain we use now. Only with one extra >> dependency in front of it.
> a2x (http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/a2x.1.html) states that it can > generate "PDF, EPUB, DVI, PS, LaTeX, XHTML (single page or chunked), man > page, HTML Help or plain text formats using asciidoc(1) and other > applications (see REQUISITES section). SOURCE_FILE can also be a DocBook > file with an .xml extension." AFAICS, for all cases other than HTML output, the "other applications" are basically the docbook toolchain. > What I expect would be a lot more effort is actually converting all the > SGML to asciidoc. A quick google search doesn't turn up anything promising. Yeah, the cost of conversion means we're not likely to want to experiment to see what's better :-(. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
