On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I mean, I can't see that building a PDF of the documentation really > has much value, and I don't know even what else we can build. Who in > 2015 would use a PDF instead of HTML? > > (If there is somebody, that is fine. But I am curious who it is and > why, because it seems to me like it would just be a nuisance.)
Paper publication, say that for example: http://www.network-theory.co.uk/postgresql9/vol1a/ I imagine that this applies as well to other languages as it is easier to maintain a translation of the documentation by hacking the sgml code. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers