On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I mean, I can't see that building a PDF of the documentation really
> has much value, and I don't know even what else we can build.  Who in
> 2015 would use a PDF instead of HTML?
>
> (If there is somebody, that is fine.  But I am curious who it is and
> why, because it seems to me like it would just be a nuisance.)

Paper publication, say that for example:
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/postgresql9/vol1a/
I imagine that this applies as well to other languages as it is easier
to maintain a translation of the documentation by hacking the sgml
code.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to