While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places
that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the
macro that is used elsewhere.  Should that be changed for consistency,
as in the attached?

Thomas Munro

Attachment: use-lockbit-on-macro.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to