On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places
> that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the
> macro that is used elsewhere.  Should that be changed for consistency,
> as in the attached?

Sure, why not?


Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to