On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 08:10 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> -1 on that idea. I really don't think that we should categorically
>> decide we don't support higher optimization levels. If the compiler
>> has a bug, then the compiler manufacturer should fix it, and it's not
>> our fault. If the compiler doesn't have a bug and our stuff is
>> blowing up, then we have a bug and should fix it. I suppose there
>> could be some grey area but hopefully not too much.
> Or it's PILBChAK. I know Sun-CC used to warn that -O3 was unsuitable for
> most programs because it could change behavior.
I'm attempting to decipher this acronym. Problem is located between
chair and keyboard? But I don't see how that applies here.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: