On 29.09.2015 00:34, Tom Lane wrote:
Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
On 9/28/15 11:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
It has been stated pretty clearly in this thread by a number of senior
community people that we're not going to use a closed source system.

GitLab OTOH is released under a MIT license, so it is an option. I don't
know how it compares to other suggested options, but if YUriy wants to
propose it it's at least a viable option.

I think a more accurate summary of what's been said is that we won't
consider putting any important functionality on proprietary platforms,
of which closed-source tools would be a subset.  The intention of the
community is that we'll be around for as long as there's a critical mass
of people interested in maintaining Postgres.  We will not be dependent
on any one company, and that's why e.g. github is out.  (A lot of smaller
open-source projects don't have the luxury of rejecting such options ...
but we do, and we will.)

Now, running gitlab on community-owned hardware would potentially be an
option, if we find gitlab attractive from a functionality standpoint.
The question I'd have about that is whether it has a real development
community, or is open-source in name only.  If github did go belly up,
would we find ourselves maintaining the gitlab code all by ourselves?
That might not be the end of the world, but it wouldn't be a good use
of community time either.

I ported GitLab to run on FreeBSD. From this progress i can say, that there is an active community. Many of the features (and bugfixes) came directly from the community.

I'm not for or against GitLab. I just wanted to point this out.

As mentioned in another Thread Bugzilla is used by LibreOffice and Linux. I want to add FreeBSD to the list.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to