On 2015-10-01 16:48:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > That would require people to actually use the bug form to submit the > initial thread as well of course - which most developers don't do > themselves today. But there is in itself nothing that prevents them from > doing that, of course - other than a Small Amount Of Extra Work.
It'd be cool if there were a newbug@ or similar mail address that automatically also posted to -bugs or so. > I think when a patch is directly related to a specific bug as reported > through the webform, don't most committers already refer to that bug > number? Maybe not every time, but at least most of the time? It's the many > discussions that don't actually have a bug number and yet result in a patch > that don't? I think it's mentioned somewhere in the commit message most of the time - but not in an easy to locate way. If we'd agree on putting something like: Bug: #XXX Affected-Versions: 9.5- Fixed-Versions: 9.3- in commit messages that'd be a fair bit easier to get into the release notes.. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers