Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm. The problem I've got with this is that then mean_query_len means
>> something significantly different after entry_dealloc than it does
>> after gc_texts.
>>
>> I'd be okay with changing *both* of those functions to ignore sticky
>> entries in the calculation, if that seems reasonable to you.
> That seems perfectly reasonable, yes. Should I leave that to you?
Sure, I can take it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
