On 10/07/2015 11:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 10/07/2015 10:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Hmm, I guess we could have the bug form add >>> To: n...@bugs.postgresql.org >>> CC: pgsql-b...@postgresql.org >>> as headers, which should work for most people (since we reply-all), Josh >>> Berkus being the exception. >> >> Well, this will just give you more opportunities to ignore me. > > Currently, it just means I have to look harder for stuff you post -- I > certainly do not ignore you.
I know, I'm just "Joshing" you. > I worry that in the future it might mean > your messages don't make it to the "bug threads", if we have such a > thing. See my followup to Stephen, > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20151007175841.GE4405%40alvherre.pgsql > where some traffic was not present in the mailing list archives but it > does appear in the bug report itself. I think we need to make it very > hard for that to happen, and lack of CCs might become a problem. As a serious response, "reply-all" is NOT the default for common GUI mail clients (TB, Apple, Gmail, etc.), and I know on TB that it's not even possible to make it the default (I miss Kmail). So a system which depends on the user ... including outside bug reporters ... always hitting "reply all" is going to have some issues. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
