On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 October 2015 at 15:05, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Attached is a simple patch that appears to work, but it needs more >> testing (and some regression tests). >> > > Here's an updated patch with an extra regression test case that > triggers the issue. > > I've also updated the function comment for expand_security_quals() to > better explain the situations where it actually has work to do -- > tables with RLS and updates to auto-updatable security barrier views, > but not SELECTs from security berrier views. This explains why this > bug doesn't affect security barrier views (UNION ALL views aren't > auto-updatable), so only 9.5 and HEAD need to be patched.
Thanks for the patch. I didn't find any problem in my test with the patch. Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
