Dean, * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 8 October 2015 at 15:05, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Attached is a simple patch that appears to work, but it needs more > > testing (and some regression tests). > > Here's an updated patch with an extra regression test case that > triggers the issue.
Thanks! > I've also updated the function comment for expand_security_quals() to > better explain the situations where it actually has work to do -- > tables with RLS and updates to auto-updatable security barrier views, > but not SELECTs from security berrier views. This explains why this > bug doesn't affect security barrier views (UNION ALL views aren't > auto-updatable), so only 9.5 and HEAD need to be patched. Excellent, I definitely like the additional comments. I plan to do a bit more testing tomorrow morning, but barring any issues found or concerns raised, I'll push this sometime tomorrow. Thanks again! Stephen
Description: Digital signature