* Dean Rasheed ( wrote:
> On 8 October 2015 at 15:05, Dean Rasheed <> wrote:
> > Attached is a simple patch that appears to work, but it needs more
> > testing (and some regression tests).
> Here's an updated patch with an extra regression test case that
> triggers the issue.


> I've also updated the function comment for expand_security_quals() to
> better explain the situations where it actually has work to do --
> tables with RLS and updates to auto-updatable security barrier views,
> but not SELECTs from security berrier views. This explains why this
> bug doesn't affect security barrier views (UNION ALL views aren't
> auto-updatable), so only 9.5 and HEAD need to be patched.

Excellent, I definitely like the additional comments.

I plan to do a bit more testing tomorrow morning, but barring any
issues found or concerns raised, I'll push this sometime tomorrow.

Thanks again!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to