On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Hmm, well, why wasn't that back-patched? We expect these tests to run > on Windows don't we?
The message related to this particular commit is here: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/55b90161.5090...@iki.fi I recall that we discussed about back-patching more such things to improve the buildfarm coverage but I guess it fell from other's radar. Would you consider pushing any sync-up patch for 9.5 and 9.4 I could send? At quick glance, I think that's basically a combination of adb4950, 13d856e1, 690ed2b and ff85fc8. Andrew, Noah, Heikki, and others feel free to object of course if you think that's an utterly bad idea. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers