Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-10-14 13:04:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > It doesn't seem to me that a connector such as npgsql has any business
> > whatsoever fooling with such a parameter, unconditionally or otherwise.
> I think in npgsql simply doesn't support renegotiation (IIRC because
> it'd have been hard to implement in .net). Which makes it somewhat
> reasonable to set it to 0.

I think we could continue to have the parameter except that it throws an
error if you try to set it to something other than 0.

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to