Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-10-14 13:04:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > It doesn't seem to me that a connector such as npgsql has any business
> > whatsoever fooling with such a parameter, unconditionally or otherwise.
> I think in npgsql simply doesn't support renegotiation (IIRC because
> it'd have been hard to implement in .net). Which makes it somewhat
> reasonable to set it to 0.
I think we could continue to have the parameter except that it throws an
error if you try to set it to something other than 0.
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: