On 2015-10-16 16:41:16 +0300, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> > If not, the only solution I can see is for PostgreSQL to not protest if it
> > sees the
> > parameter in the startup packet.
> Yeah, that's the ideal solution here as far as I'm concerned.
Well, it seems that's where we're ending up then. Could you prepare a
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: