2015-10-15 15:42 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> writes: > > I was thinking about this and what seems to be the biggest problem is > when > > to actually turn the feature on. It seems unlikely that someone will > want > > to enable it unconditionally. Enabling per-backend also doesn't seem to > be > > a good approach because you don't know if the next query you'd like to > look > > at is going to run in this exact backend. > > Check. > > > What might be actually usable is poking pg_stat_statements for queryid to > > decide if we need to do explain (and possibly analyze). > > Hm, interesting thought. > > > Does this make sense to you? Does this make a good argument for merging > > pg_stat_statements and auto_explain into core? > > I'd say more that it's a good argument for moving this feature out to > one of those extensions, or perhaps building a third extension that > depends on both of those. TBH, none of this stuff smells to me like > something that ought to be in core. >
There are few features, that I would to see in core: 1. possibility to get full SQL string 2. possibility to get state string We can speak how to do it well. Regards Pavel > > regards, tom lane >