Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>>>>> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, the issue is still here: login through gssapi fails with >>>>>>> your patch, not with HEAD. This patch is next on my review list by >>>>>>> the way so I'll see what I can do about it soon even if I am in >>>>>>> the US for Postgres Open next week. Still, how did you test it? I >>>>>>> am just creating by myself a KDC, setting up a valid credential >>>>>>> with kinit, and after setting up Postgres for this purpose the >>>>>>> protocol communication just fails. >>> >>> I have no issues, no sync loss; nothing is amiss as far as I can see. >>> If there is actually a problem here, I need more information from you. >>> At the very least, as previously mentioned, I need to know what >>> messages went over the wire to/from the server before it occurred, and >>> what command (if it it made it to command processing) it was in the >>> midst of sending. >> >> Any follow-up on this? I'd really like my code to be bug-free. > > I don't know if this is worth posting as the patch is currently > returned with feedback and you are redoing it in a different way, but > with your patch I get this error when connecting: > > lost synchronization with server: got message type "T", length 27 > The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed. > > I only get the error when connection to a patched server from a > patched libpq. If either is unpatched, then there is no problem. > > Let me know if this is worth looking into.
Definitely good to know, and I appreciate your testing. It's probably not worth looking into right now, but please do test the next version of the code as well. Thanks! --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
