On 10/28/15 10:27 AM, Bill Moran wrote: > See subject. Aside from them being divvied up by datatype, they seem > to be ordered randomly. Since I'm putting together a patch that will > add some GUCs, do I just add them to the end of the list?
The initial commit grouped them logically, and it went downhill from there. :) But "at the end" is almost never a good answer in these situations, I think. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
