On 10/28/2015 01:58 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 10/28/15 10:27 AM, Bill Moran wrote: >> See subject. Aside from them being divvied up by datatype, they seem >> to be ordered randomly. Since I'm putting together a patch that will >> add some GUCs, do I just add them to the end of the list? > > The initial commit grouped them logically, and it went downhill from > there. :)
Yeah, we're overdue for another overhaul of GUC ordering. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
