On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Amit Langote
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2015/10/29 23:22, Syed, Rahila wrote:
> How about the following instead -
>
> + snprintf(progress_message[0], PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH, "%s",
> +                                       generate_relation_name(onerel));

That was a useless suggestion, sorry. It still could be rewritten as -

+ snprintf(progress_message[0], PROGRESS_MESSAGE_LENGTH, "%s.%s",
+                          get_namespace_name(RelationGetNamespace(rel)),
+                          relname);

Thanks,
Amit


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to