Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Perhaps we could do something with a hybrid technique: don't materialize
> the cursor output unless user actually asks for backwards scan. 

Or we can check the existence of SCROLL keyword which is
currently ignored. In the first place SQL standard only
allows NEXT fetch unless SCROLL is specified.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
        http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Reply via email to