Nikolay Shaplov <n.shap...@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> But this is not the issue. We can change it any way we like. The question do
> we need such example at all, or no?
I'm kind of -1 on the idea of a module that doesn't actually do something
*useful*. Let's write some actual tests instead, and make them readable
enough that people can steal and repurpose the skeleton easily.
> I wrote this example based on ssl TAP test. There was no DBI there. And I
> think it was done for purpose. If we add DBI to tests, then we should add it
> to build dependencies. And it is not a good idea, and so not a good example.
Agreed. We aren't going to accept any core tests that depend on DBI/DBD.
Now, that might be a fine example for tests written to test something that
uses Postgres ... but not as an example of how to write a core test.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
