В письме от 19 ноября 2015 10:57:27 пользователь Tom Lane написал:
> Nikolay Shaplov <n.shap...@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> > But this is not the issue. We can change it any way we like. The question
> > do we need such example at all, or no?
> I'm kind of -1 on the idea of a module that doesn't actually do something
Actually it tests that sameuser option from pg_hba.conf works as expected.
Allow user to connect only to database with the same name as user name.
I can't say it is something really useful. But my intention was to write an
example, so I choose the most simple functionality to test, so the user of the
example can pay all attention to perl related staff.
I just thought this example might be useful to others. If so, I can prepare it
for commit. Otherwise I will just use it were I intended.
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: