В письме от 19 ноября 2015 10:57:27 пользователь Tom Lane написал: > Nikolay Shaplov <n.shap...@postgrespro.ru> writes: > > But this is not the issue. We can change it any way we like. The question > > do we need such example at all, or no? > > I'm kind of -1 on the idea of a module that doesn't actually do something > *useful*. Actually it tests that sameuser option from pg_hba.conf works as expected. Allow user to connect only to database with the same name as user name.
I can't say it is something really useful. But my intention was to write an example, so I choose the most simple functionality to test, so the user of the example can pay all attention to perl related staff. I just thought this example might be useful to others. If so, I can prepare it for commit. Otherwise I will just use it were I intended. -- Nikolay Shaplov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
