В письме от 19 ноября 2015 10:57:27 пользователь Tom Lane написал:
> Nikolay Shaplov <n.shap...@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> > But this is not the issue. We can change it any way we like. The question
> > do we need such example at all, or no?
> I'm kind of -1 on the idea of a module that doesn't actually do something
> *useful*. 
Actually it tests that sameuser  option from pg_hba.conf works as expected.  
Allow user to connect only to database with the same name as user name.

I can't say it is something really useful. But my intention was to write an 
example, so I choose the most simple functionality to test, so the user of the 
example can pay all attention to perl related staff. 

I just thought this example might be useful to others. If so, I can prepare it 
for commit. Otherwise I will just use it were I intended.

Nikolay Shaplov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to