On 20 November 2015 at 09:18, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
wrote:

> On 2015/11/06 1:29, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Amit Langote
> > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >> The DDL and catalogs part are not much different from what I had last
> >> described though I took a few steps to simplify things. I dropped the
> >> multi-level partitioning bit
> >
> > Hmm, that doesn't sound good to me.  I think multi-level partitioning
> > is a reasonably important use case.
>
> I agree. I'm in the process of reformulating this proposal from the
> syntax, catalog and DDL -centric perspective and will re-incorporate
> multi-level partitioning notion into it. It was a mistake to drop it.
>

Drop it?? I think he means "in this initial patch", right Amit L ?

I don't really understand why parallel query was pursued in small pieces,
but partitioning needs to happen all in one huge patch. Wishing too many
things is going to slow down this feature.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to