On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 20 November 2015 at 09:18, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> On 2015/11/06 1:29, Robert Haas wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Amit Langote >> > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> >> The DDL and catalogs part are not much different from what I had last >> >> described though I took a few steps to simplify things. I dropped the >> >> multi-level partitioning bit >> > >> > Hmm, that doesn't sound good to me. I think multi-level partitioning >> > is a reasonably important use case. >> >> I agree. I'm in the process of reformulating this proposal from the >> syntax, catalog and DDL -centric perspective and will re-incorporate >> multi-level partitioning notion into it. It was a mistake to drop it. > > > Drop it?? I think he means "in this initial patch", right Amit L ?
Yes, there was some notion of multi-level partitioning in the earlier patch but I removed it from the version I posted on Oct 30. I do intend to re-introduce it though. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
