On 2015-11-26 19:22:23 +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote: > On Thursday 26 November 2015 11:10:36 you wrote: > > Adding a new build > > dependency is bad enough; adding one that isn't easily available is a > > show-stopper. > > If someone decided to compile from source Postgres rather than install from > RPM then it will not be a problem as to build CMake.
Packages have to be built from something, and usually it's desirable that all dependencies are from within the distribution. I don't think you'll have much success pushing back on this. > It is possible to make support for CMake 2.6 but now is not the time when you > have to think about it. I'll come back to this when all the functionality > will > work. No point in doing any work if you don't agree with the basic prerequisites. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
