Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > I can think of a use-case for a user who can call pg_switch_xlog, but > > > not pg_start_backup()/pg_stop_backup(), but I have to admit that it > > > seems rather limited and I'm on the fence about it being a worthwhile > > > distinction. > > > > Sounds too narrow to me. Are we going to have a separate predefined > > role for every security-restricted function to which someone might > > want to grant access? That seems over the top to me. > > I certainly don't want to go down to that level and was, as seen above, > unsure about having pg_switch_xlog() as a differentiated privilege. > Michael, do you still see that as a useful independent capability?
Hmm, Robert's argument seems reasonable -- we can continue to offer access to individual elements by granting execute on a security-definer function owned by predefined user pg_backup. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers