"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> This seems surprising to me: any other program in the world would do >>> exit(1) after discovering that it couldn't write where it had been >>> told to. Should we change this?
>> I assume this is a rhetorical question. > How about this one: do we change this behavior in the back branches? I don't think we should change this in stable branches. I would vote for fixing it in 9.5, though, mainly because the fix is going to interact with the extended-mode-wrap fixes I'm also working on. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers