On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:46 AM, YUriy Zhuravlev > <u.zhurav...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> On Tuesday 01 December 2015 08:38:21 you wrote: >>> it (zero >>> based indexing support) doesn't meet the standard of necessity for >>> adding to the core API and as stated it's much to magical. >> >> We do not touch the arrays, we simply create a function to access them with a >> comfortable behavior. Creating a separate array types in the form extension >> is >> very difficult IMHO. > > Correct; what I'm saying is that we don't need core API support for > zero based array indexing.
Yes. I think adding new functions that use an indexing convention inconsistent with the one we're using for everything else ought to be completely out of the question. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
