On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> +1. >> > I think there is still a lot functionality that is offered without > EvalPlanQual fix.
Sure. But I think that the EvalPlanQual-related fixes might have some impact on the overall design, and I don't want to commit this with one design and then have to revise it because we didn't examine the EvalPlanQual requirements carefully enough. We've already been down that path once, and I don't want to go back. It's not always possible to get the design right the first time, but it's definitely nicer when you do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
