Hi, On 2015/12/14 17:34, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > At Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:40:20 -0500, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote >> But is it important enough to be worthwhile? Maybe, maybe not. I >> think we should be working toward a world where the Gather is at the >> top of the plan tree as often as possible, in which case >> asynchronously kicking off a Gather node won't be that exciting any >> more - see notes on the "parallelism + sorting" thread where I talk >> about primitives that would allow massively parallel merge joins, >> rather than 2 or 3 way parallel. > > Could you give me the subject of the thread? Or important message > of that.
I think that would be the following thread: * parallelism and sorting * http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoyh4zsqmgqiyra7zo1rbbvg1qhn1fjt5q0fpw+q0xa...@mail.gmail.com Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers