On 2015-12-17 09:04:25 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > > But I'm somewhat confused what this has to do with Andres's report. > > Doesn't it explain the exact situation he is in, where the oldest > database is 200 million, but the cluster as a whole is 2 billion?
There were no crashes, so no, I don't think so. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
