On 2015-12-17 13:08:15 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2015-12-17 09:04:25 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > >> > But I'm somewhat confused what this has to do with Andres's report. > >> > >> Doesn't it explain the exact situation he is in, where the oldest > >> database is 200 million, but the cluster as a whole is 2 billion? > > > > There were no crashes, so no, I don't think so. > > Backing up a step, do we think that the fact that this was running in > a shell rather than a screen is relevant somehow? Or did something > happen to this particular cluster totally unrelated to that?
I reran the whole thing on a separate, but very similar, VM. Just checked. Same thing happened. This time I have log files and everything. No time to investigate right now, but it's reproducible if you accept running tests for a week or so. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers