On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote
<langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next
>> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way.
> Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=385f337c9f39b21dca96ca4770552a10a6d5af24

Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less
epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as
committed then.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to