On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote
> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next
>>> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way.
>> Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=385f337c9f39b21dca96ca4770552a10a6d5af24
> Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less
> epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as
> committed then.

+1.  And thanks.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to