On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next >>> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way. >> >> Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit: >> >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=385f337c9f39b21dca96ca4770552a10a6d5af24 > > Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less > epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as > committed then.
+1. And thanks. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
