On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Michael Paquier
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote
> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next
>>> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way.
>> Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit:
> Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less
> epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as
> committed then.
+1. And thanks.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: