On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good
>> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong.
> It doesn't appear in the documentation. The term "inference
> specification" only appears where it's necessary to precisely describe
> the input to unique index inference.

Well, we can change this to say "inference specification", but I still
think calling it the "ON CONFLICT" clause would be clearer in this

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to