On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good >> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong. > > It doesn't appear in the documentation. The term "inference > specification" only appears where it's necessary to precisely describe > the input to unique index inference.
Well, we can change this to say "inference specification", but I still think calling it the "ON CONFLICT" clause would be clearer in this context. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers