On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> I went over this patch in some detail today and did a lot of cosmetic
>> cleanup. The results are attached. I'm fairly happy with this
>> version, but let me know what you think. Of course, feedback from
>> others is more than welcome also.
> Attached patch with some cosmetic changes (listed here for your quick
> 1. , was replaced with ; in comment "inner join, expressions in the " at one
> place, which is correct, but missed other place.
> 2. The comment "First, consider whether any each active EC is potentially"
> should use either "any" or "each". I have reworded it as "First, consider
> whether any of the active ECs is potentially ...". Or we can use "First,
> find all of the active ECs which are potentially ....".
> 3. "having the remote side due the sort generally won't be any worse ..." -
> instead of "due" we should use "do"?
> 4. Added static prototype of function get_useful_ecs_for_relation().
> 5. The comment "Extract unique EC for query, if any, so we don't consider it
> again." is too crisp. Phrase "Unique EC for query" is confusing; EC can not
> be associated with a query per say and EC's are always unique because of
> canonicalisation. May be we should reword it as "Extract single EC for
> ordering of query, if any, so we don't consider it again." Is that cryptic
> as well?
Thanks. I committed this version with one small tweak.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: