Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > If we are not doing a scan_all and we fail to acquire a clean-up lock on > the last block, and the last block reports that it needs freezing, then we > continue on to wait for the clean-up lock. But there is no need, we don't > really need to freeze the block, and we already know whether it has tuples > or not without the clean up lock. Couldn't we just set the flag based on > hastup, then 'continue'?
Uh, isn't that what my patch is doing? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers