Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > So like the attached, although it is a bit weird to call > lazy_check_needs_freeze if , under !scan_all, we don't actually care > about whether it needs freezing but only the hastup.
I think this misses unpinning the buffer in the added code path. I rearranged to avoid that, did some other cosmetic work, and committed. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers