Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes:
> So like the attached, although it is a bit weird to call
> lazy_check_needs_freeze if , under !scan_all, we don't actually care
> about whether it needs freezing but only the hastup.
Advertising
I think this misses unpinning the buffer in the added code path.
I rearranged to avoid that, did some other cosmetic work, and committed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
