On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 04:53:26PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-01-05 10:48:43 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 04:42:24PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2016-01-05 10:40:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 04:31:15PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > > > > > On 2016-01-05 10:28:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Yes? But it's ok sizewise on the common platforms? > > > > > > > > What is the uncommon part? I guess I missed that. > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20151212181702.GH17938%40alap3.anarazel.de > > > > Yes, I saw that, and the URL in the email, but what is the uncommon > > case? > > Are you asking which platforms s_lock is larger than a char? If so, grep > s_lock.h for typedefs. If not, I'm not following what you're asking for?
Yes, that is the information I was looing for. I see s_lock defined as int-sized on Itanium, ARM, PowerPC, MIPS, m32r, PA-RISC, Windows, Sunstudio. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers