On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 01/05/2016 08:04 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: >> >> I am not aware of such cases, however the reason I have kept it was for >> backward-compatability, but now I have removed it in the attached patch. >> >> Apart from that, I have updated the docs to reflect the changes related >> to new API's. >> > > xfunc.sgml: > > + after allocating LWLocks, verify that the number of allocated > + LWLocks is same as requested; > > Did you mean to put this check in ? > Yes, it is good to check, right now I have added Assert in code as I think it is a dev problem to over-allocate the lwlocks.
With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com